Night Time Eating And Fat Loss Revisited
“Eat breakfast like a king, eat lunch like a prince and eat dinner like a pauper.” This maxim can be attributed to nutrition writer Adelle Davis, and since her passing in 1974, the advice to eat less at night to help with fat loss has lived on and continued to circulate in many different incarnations. This includes suggestions such as:
“Dont eat a lot before bedtime”
“Don’t eat midnight snacks”
“Don’t eat anything after 7pm”
“Don’t eat any carbs at night”
“Don’t eat any carbs after 3 pm”
and so on…
I too believe that eating lightly at night is usually very solid advice for people seeking increased fat loss, especially for people who are inactive at night. However, some fitness experts today, when they hear “eat less at night”, start screaming, Diet Voodoo!”…
Opinions on this subject are definitely mixed. Many highly respected experts strongly recommend eating less at night to improve fat loss, while others suggest that it’s only calories in vs calories out over 24 hours that matters.
The critics say that it’s ridiculous to cut off food intake at a certain hour or to presume that “carbs turn to fat” at night as if there were some kind of nocturnal carbohydrate gremlins waiting to shuttle calories into fat cells when the moon is full. They suggest that if you eat less in the morning and eat more at night, it all “balances itself out at the end of the day.”
Of course, food does not turn to fat just because it’s eaten after a certain “cutoff hour” and carbs do not necessarily turn to fat at night either (although there are hypotheses about low evening insulin sensitivity having some significance). What we do know for certain is that the law of energy balance is with us at all hours of the day - and that bears some deeper consideration when you realize that we expend the least energy when we are sleeping and many people spend the entire evening watching TV.
I recently had the privilege of interviewing sports nutritionist and dietician Dan Benardot, PhD for our members-only fat loss support community at www.BurnTheFatInnerCircle.com, and he gave us a very interesting perspective on this.
Dr. Benardot said that thinking in terms of 24 hour energy balance may be a seriously flawed and outdated concept. He says that the old model of energy balance looks at calories in versus calories out in 24 hour units. However, what really happens is that your body allocates energy minute by minute and hour by hour as your body’s needs dictate, not at some specified 24 hour end point.
I first heard this concept suggested by Dr. Fred Hatfield about 15 years ago. Hatfield explained how and why you should be thinking ahead to the next three hours and adjusting your energy intake accordingly.
Although it’s not really a new idea, Dr. Benardot has recently taken this concept to a much higher level of refinement and he calls the new paradigm, “Within Day Energy Balance.”
The Within Day Energy balance approach not only backs up the practice of eating small meals approximately every three hours, AND the practice of “nutrient timing” (which is why post workout nutrition is such a popular topic today, and rightly so)… it also suggests that we should adjust our energy intake according to our activity.
Let’s make the assumption most people come home from work, then plop on the couch in front of the TV all night. Let’s also assume that the majority of people go to bed late in the evening, usually around 10 pm, 11 pm or midnight. Therefore, nightime is the period during which the least energy is being expended.
If this is true, then it’s logical to suggest that one should not eat huge amounts of calories at night, especially right before bed because that would provide excess fuel at a time when it is not needed. The result is increased likelihood of fat storage.From the within day energy balance perspective, the advice to eat less at night makes complete sense. Of course it also suggests that if you train at night, then you should eat more at night to support that activity beforehand and to support recovery afterwards.
Those stuck on a 24 hour model of energy expenditure would say timing of energy intake doesnt matter as long as the total calories for the day are in a deficit. But who ever decided that the body operates on a 24-hour “DAY”.
Try this test (or not!): Eat a 2500 calorie per day diet, with nothing for breakfast, nothing before or after your morning workout, 500 calories for lunch, 750 calories for dinner and 1250 calories before bedtime.
Now compare that to the SAME 2500 calorie diet with 6 small meals of approximately 420 calories per meal and then tweak those meal sizes a bit so that you eat a little more before and after your workout and a little less later at night.
Both are 2500 calories per day. According to “24 hour energy balance” thinking, both diets will produce the same results in performance, health and body composition. But will they?
Does your body really do a calculation at midnight and add up the day’s totals like a business man when he closes out the register at night? It’s a lot more logical that energy is stored in real time and energy is burned in real time, rather than accounted for at the end of each 24 hour period.
24 hour energy balance is just one way to academically sort calories so you can understand it and count it in convenient units of time. This has it’s uses, as in calculating a daily calorie intake level for menu planning purposes.
Ok, but enough about calories, what about the individual macronutrients? Some people dont simply suggest eating fewer calories at night, they suggest you take your calorie cut specifically from CARBS rather than from all macronutrients evenly across the board. Is there anything to it?
Well, there’s more than one theory. The most commonly quoted theory has to do with insulin.
The late bodybuilding guru Dan Duchaine was once asked by a competitor,
“I want to get cut up for an upcoming contest. Should I eat at night? I heard I shouldn’t eat carbs after six pm.”
Duchaine answered:“It’s true that insulin sensitivity is lowest at night. Let’s discuss what is happening in your body that makes it dislike carbs at night. Cortisol, a catabolic hormone, is highest at night. When cortisol is elevated, your muscle cell insulin sensitivity is lowered…”
More recently, David Barr wrote a tip on “lower carbs at night” for T-Nation. He said:
“Even when bulking, you don’t want to start scarfing down Pop Tarts before you go to bed. Our muscle insulin sensitivity decreases as the day wears on, meaning that we’re more likely to generate a large insulin response from ingesting carbs. Stated differently, we’re more predisposed to adding fat mass by eating carbs at night because our body doesn’t handle the hormone insulin as well as it does earlier in the day.”
Mind you, Barr is a not a “voodoo” guy; he is a respected scientist who also happens to be well known as a “dogma destroyer” and “myth buster”… and Duchaine, although he had a shady past and some run-ins with the law, was nevertheless highly respected by nearly all in the bodybuilding world for his ahead-of-his-time nutrition wisdom.
As a result of advice like this, word got out in the bodybuilding and fitness community that you should eat fewer carbs at night. Real world results and the “test of time” have suggested that this is an effective strategy. I also don’t know a single nutrition or training expert who doesn’t agree that insulin management and improvement of insulin sensitivity aren’t effective approaches in the management of body fat.
However, it’s only fair to point out that not all scientists agree that cutting carbs at night will have any real world impact on fat loss, outside of any additional calorie deficit created by it. Dr. Benardot, for example, doesn’t think there’s much to it. He says that exercisers and athletes in particular, usually have excellent glycemic control, so the ratio of macronutrients should not be as much of an issue as the total energy balance in relation to energy needs at a particular time and the meal frequency (eating every 3 hours).
Regardless of which side of the “carbs at night” debate you lean towards, if you consider the within day energy balance principle, it makes perfect sense not to eat large, calorie-dense meals late at night before bedtime.
Keep in mind of course, that cutting back on your calories and or carbs at night makes the most sense in the context of a fat loss program, especially if fat loss has been slow. It’s quite possible that I might give the exact opposite advice to the skinny “ectomorph” who is having a hard time gaining muscular body weight.
Also consider that this doesn’t necessarily mean eating nothing at night; it may simply mean eating smaller meals or emphasizing lean protein and green veggies (or a small protein shake) at night.
Many programs suggest a specific time when you should eat your last meal of the day. However, I’d suggest avoiding an absolute cut off time, such as “no food or no carbs after 6 pm, etc,” because people go to bed at different times, and maintenance of steady blood sugar and an optimal hormonal balance even at night are also important goals.
A more personalized suggestion is to cut off food intake 3 hours before bedtime, if practical and possible. For example, if you eat dinner at 6 pm, but don’t go to bed until 12 midnight, then a small 9 pm meal or a snack makes sense, but keep it light, preferably lean protein, and dont raid the refrigerator at 11:55!
An important rule to remember in all cases, is that whatever is working, keep doing more of it. If you eat your largest meal before bed and lose fat anyway, I would never tell you to change that. Results are what counts. On the other hand, if you’re stuck at a fat loss plateau, this is a technique I’d suggest you give a try.
Night time eating is likely to remain a subject of debate - especially the part about whether carbs should be targeted for removal in evening meals.
However, perhaps even those who are skeptical can consider, that if cutting out carbs at night is effective for fat loss, it may be for the simple reason that it forces you to eat less automatically.
In other words, setting a rule to eat fewer calories or to eat fewer carbs at night may be a very effective way to keep your daily calories in check and to match intake to activity, whereas people who are allowed to eat ad libitum at night when they’re home, glued to the couch and watching TV, etc., may tend to overeat when food is readily available, but the energy is not needed in large amounts.
Me personally? Unless I’m weight training at night, I have always reduced calories and carbs at night when “cutting” for bodybuilding competition. It’s worked so well for me that I devoted a whole section to it in my program, Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle (BFFM) and I call the techniques “calorie tapering” and “carb tapering.” For more information on how I use these methods to help me reach single digit body fat, you can visit: www.BurnTheFat.com
Train hard and expect success.
Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCSwww.BurnTheFat.com
www.BurnTheFatInnerCircle.com
PPS. Dr. Benardot has a brand new online software application that tracks within day energy balance using a highly sophisticated algorithm. I havent tried it yet, but it looks very interesting. the website is www.SportsNutritionClinic.com
15 February, 2007 posted in Food & Nutrition


Comments
well i'm not saying that it is a scientific fact, but my sister did stop eating as much during the night time and with no other changes, she lost a lot of weight without exercise and she wasn't a very active person.
Posted by: Frank | February 15, 2007 9:24 PM
As a diabetic, I need to eat a small amount of carbo before going to sleep, or I wake up with very high sugars. The Dr explained that my liver kicks out glucogen or something similar if there is too long a time between meals.
I know I lost 97 lbs when I finally listened and are more frequently. I limit my meals to 1 cup of food with 10-12 grams carb each meal. I also had to increase protein a little to satisfy hunger if I needed because protein is neutral in its effect on blood sugar.
Posted by: Shirley | February 15, 2007 11:16 PM
I couldn't agree more with your comment that whatever seems to work for you should not be changed - no matter what the latest fad diet or exercise regimen might be. Even though my sister and I are both endomorphs and come from a family of the same, we both have to "diet" and exercise differently because I tend to bulk up while she tends to tone in the thighs, hips, waist and bust when lifting weights. I've noticed that cutting carbs works best for me, but that would be quite harmful to her as she has been diagnosed with hypoglycemia. Given this, it should be quite apparent that even within the same family, individuals are unique and so are their nutritional needs. If I'm losing weight by cutting out my carbs at the end of the day, I'm sticking to that because after all, it's my goals I'm trying to reach...not someone else's.
Posted by: Penelope E. Xanthakis | February 16, 2007 12:28 AM
It makes total sense not to think in terms of 24 hours. Our bodies were designed by nature, the 24-hour concept is man made. How could they be compatible on a nutritional level?
Also, I don't see our caveman ancestors stumbling about blindly in the dark in search of food before bed time. They may have had some reserves for an evening snack, but no big meal. Genetically we're still cavemen, even though our brains have come a long way since those times of hunting and gathering.
It may also be an individual thing, but I believe most people will benefit from less food in general at night, and less carbs for sure - exception made for diabetics or other medical considerations.
Posted by: Sarah | February 16, 2007 6:53 AM
The most important thing to remeber is that EVERYBODY'S body is different, & your own body will change with age.
You have to attack weight loss with a marine mentalilty...Adapt & Overcome. You have to find out what works for you. I basically use all the diet knowledge as a guideline, never an ultimatum.
When I was a competitive bodybuilder, the 6pm rule was like "the" golden rule. However, you would have to be in bed at 9pm for this to be effective. I would normally knock out at 11 pm & get up at 5 am for training. 6-11 is a 5 hour stretch....a long time with no food supply. 11-5 is 6 hours of sleep ( body is at rested state so I would estimate 3 hours more w/o food). At 5am, I would feel like I had not eaten anything in days (starving effect). I adjusted this by making 7-7:30 pm being my last meal and a before bedtime snack of 1 bananna & protein drink (sometimes blended together). It made a HUGE difference & I felt alot better in the morning before my training session.
So as I mentioned & Tom has said many times, find out what works best for you & your body.
Posted by: Bob | February 16, 2007 7:22 AM
More often than not I train in the evening and sometimes as late as 8 or 9:00 pm... making post workout meals a necessity about an hour or so before bedtimein some cases. I have tried it with and without the last meal and find that I rest better if I eat lighlty before sleeping.
Posted by: gary coggin | February 16, 2007 11:24 AM
As an ectomorph, I do lose weight if I don't eat before going to bed. So my last meal is a shake of 30 gr of proteins in 300 ml of raw whole milk.
However, it's also true that I need 2,000 calories a day in order not to lose weight (I'm female, 35, 5'6" and 115lbs), so my metabolism is very active.
The bottom line is: for ectomorphs, eating before sleeping is vital, for endomorphs it's counterproductive.
One size does NOT fit all.
Similarly, fat food makes me gain, carbs do not. My SO is the exact opposite and has to restrict bread and pasta.
Again one size does NOT fit all.
Posted by: Rosanna Tarsiero | February 16, 2007 4:38 PM
Having been severely hypoglycemic all my life, I find it imperative to eat frequently, inluding a small carb/protein/fat snack just before going to bed (such as dates and almonds) if I want to make it through the night without waking up with hunger pains and possibly nightmares.
I used to feel like I was cheating, eating something before going to bed, but I realized as a non-competitive bodybuilder (age 49 and about 17-18% bodyfat), getting a good night's sleep has a higher priority than striving for a leaner appearance.
People need to have the courage to experiment and find what works best for them! Thanks for your clear and coherent writing, Tom.
Posted by: Lee | February 17, 2007 6:29 AM
From reading all the posts, it is clear that we are all searching for what works for our bodies.
Ironically, Ori Hofmekler author of the Warrior diet suggests that we are still cave men/warriors genetically and only eating one big meal in the evening is how we're genetically programmed. My natural hunger periods seem to follow this and so I go with it.
His recomendations do follow a logical (to my point of view) feeding pattern that certainly controls insulin. For example the big meal starts with leafy green vegetables followed by protein and then starchy carbs if desired.
For me, during fat loss, this program causes too big a calorie deficet with the subsequent undesired muscle loss. There fore I have two modified versions of his "Warrior Diet". One for fat loss and one for gaining lean body mass.
In the final analysis though, the guiding principles of "Burn the fat, Feed the muscle" are ultimately my gold standard for gaining muscle and losing fat. If you are so motivated to burn the fat with appropriate exercise and feed the muscle with clean foods, it hardly matters what time you are eating.
Posted by: Chuck Cali | February 17, 2007 11:49 AM
Eating one large meal at night is not very good advice, especially for active individuals. Athletes will not even be able to come close to meeting their barest energy needs with 1 or 2 meals per day.
I have more than 30 studies in my files showing at least 8 distinct benefits (body composition, health, and performance related), of eating small frequent meals throughout the day.
indeed, there are some studies that question whether 5 or 6 meals is better than 3 meals a day in the context of weight loss programs for low energy expenditure individuals (although benefits of frequent eating go beyond weight loss, and high energy expenditure individuals will almost always perform best with 5-6 feedings a day)
However, the research literature is quite definitive that fewer than 3 meals a day is detrimental across virtually every parameter and that skipping breakfast and back end loading calories in the PM will only make things worse.
The human body is a wonderful machine. We can adapt and survive throughout some of the worst conditions and we can adapt to virtually any pattern of food intake. Certainly, we can survive on one meal a day... but we will not thrive.
I am not intersted in survival. I am interested in highest quality of life and OPTIMIZING my health. At times, I am also interested in optimizing my body composition as a physique athlete and so I will tweak and fine tune my meal timing in a way that may not be necessary for the averge person, but which surely makes a difference for a competitive athlete.
Many people who espouse infrequent or late day eating do so as a lifestyle choice because they like to eat big dinners for social and satisfaction reasons, and they say its too much trouble for them to eat 5 or 6 meals per day and still "have a life." I respect them for saying so and giving the real reasons for their choice.
However, if those people also say that 1 meal a day is how we are "supposed to" eat or that we can optimize our body composition, lean body mass gains, performance or health on such inadequate nutrition, that is when they lose complete credibility in my eyes and probably in the eyes of the scientific community as well.
The Burn The Fat method of dividing calories into 5 to 6 smaller meals is the ideal way to optimize energy intake for maximum results.
I'd suggest that most people avoid infrequent eating, or worse - infrequent & irregular eating. Heres an interesting read on this subject:
http://www.sportsnutritionclinic.com/upload/SNC_Within-Day_Energy_Balance.pdf
Best regards,
tom venuto
Posted by: tom Venuto | February 17, 2007 12:05 PM